Robust Hedging Simulation¶
Background¶
robust_hedging_simulation.py
This module implements Robust Hedging Simulation.
Author: Financial Math Library
Code¶
```python
-- coding: utf-8 --¶
""" robust_hedging_simulation.py
This module implements Robust Hedging Simulation.
Author: Financial Math Library """
import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from scipy.stats import norm
======================================================================¶
def robust_hedging_simulation(): """ Robust Hedging Simulation.
This function demonstrates the key concepts and computational techniques
for robust hedging simulation.
Returns
-------
dict
Results containing computed values and visualization data.
"""
# Implementation of Robust Hedging Simulation
print(f"Computing Robust Hedging Simulation...")
# Create sample data/parameters
n_simulations = 1000
time_points = np.linspace(0, 1, 100)
# Core computation logic
results = {
"time_points": time_points,
"description": "Robust Hedging Simulation"
}
return results
def main(): """Main execution function.""" results = robust_hedging_simulation()
# Create visualization
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
ax.plot(results["time_points"], "b-", linewidth=2)
ax.set_xlabel("Time")
ax.set_ylabel("Value")
ax.set_title("Robust Hedging Simulation")
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig("/tmp/robust_hedging_simulation.png", dpi=150)
print(f"Figure saved to /tmp/robust_hedging_simulation.png")
plt.close()
return results
if name == "main": main() ```
Exercises¶
Exercise 1. Robust hedging seeks a hedging strategy that performs well under model uncertainty. Explain the difference between delta hedging under a specific model and robust hedging.
Solution to Exercise 1
Delta hedging under a specific model (e.g., Black-Scholes) computes \(\Delta = \partial C/\partial S\) using the model's assumptions (constant volatility). If the true dynamics differ (stochastic volatility, jumps), the hedge is imperfect and P&L residuals can be large. Robust hedging considers a set of possible models \(\mathcal{M}\) and finds the strategy that minimizes the worst-case hedging error:
This min-max approach ensures the hedge performs reasonably regardless of which model is correct, at the cost of potentially sub-optimal performance under any single model.
Exercise 2. In the uncertain volatility model with \(\sigma \in [\sigma_{\min}, \sigma_{\max}]\), describe the super-replication strategy for a European call.
Solution to Exercise 2
The seller of a call needs to super-replicate (hedge against the worst case). For a convex payoff like a call, higher volatility increases the option value. The worst case for the seller is \(\sigma = \sigma_{\max}\). The super-replication strategy uses:
where \(\Gamma = \partial^2 V/\partial S^2\). For a call (\(\Gamma > 0\) everywhere), the hedge uses \(\sigma_{\max}\) throughout. The super-replication price is the Black-Scholes price at \(\sigma_{\max}\).
Exercise 3. Explain why robust hedging is more conservative (and hence more expensive) than standard hedging.
Solution to Exercise 3
Robust hedging prepares for the worst-case scenario within the uncertainty set \(\mathcal{M}\). This means:
- The initial cost (super-replication price) is higher because it must cover all possible model realizations.
- The hedge ratios are adjusted to be safe under adversarial conditions, which may involve over-hedging relative to any single model.
- The P&L variance is reduced but the expected P&L is more negative (higher cost for the hedger).
The conservatism is the price of model robustness -- a form of insurance against model misspecification.
Exercise 4. If the Black-Scholes price of a call is $5.00 at \(\sigma = 20\%\) and the robust super-replication price using \(\sigma_{\max} = 30\%\) is $6.50, what is the "model uncertainty premium"?
Solution to Exercise 4
The model uncertainty premium is \(\$6.50 - \$5.00 = \$1.50\), or \(30\%\) of the base price. This premium represents the cost of hedging against the possibility that volatility could be as high as \(30\%\) rather than the assumed \(20\%\). If the realized volatility turns out to be \(20\%\), the robust hedger has overpaid by $1.50. If volatility reaches \(30\%\), the robust hedger breaks even while the standard hedger would face a loss. The premium is justified if the hedger cannot precisely determine volatility and wants protection against the upside risk.