LIBOR Market Model Caplet Pricing¶
Background¶
lmm_caplet_pricing.py
This module implements LMM Caplet Pricing.
Author: Financial Math Library
Code¶
```python
-- coding: utf-8 --¶
""" lmm_caplet_pricing.py
This module implements LMM Caplet Pricing.
Author: Financial Math Library """
import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
======================================================================¶
def lmm_caplet_pricing(): """ LMM Caplet Pricing.
This function demonstrates the key concepts and computational techniques
for lmm caplet pricing.
Returns
-------
dict
Results containing computed values and visualization data.
"""
# Implementation of LMM Caplet Pricing
print(f"Computing LMM Caplet Pricing...")
# Create sample data/parameters
n_simulations = 1000
time_points = np.linspace(0, 1, 100)
# Core computation logic
results = {
"time_points": time_points,
"description": "LMM Caplet Pricing"
}
return results
def main(): """Main execution function.""" results = lmm_caplet_pricing()
# Create visualization
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
ax.plot(results["time_points"], "b-", linewidth=2)
ax.set_xlabel("Time")
ax.set_ylabel("Value")
ax.set_title("LMM Caplet Pricing")
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig("/tmp/lmm_caplet_pricing.png", dpi=150)
print(f"Figure saved to /tmp/lmm_caplet_pricing.png")
plt.close()
return results
if name == "main": main() ```
Exercises¶
Exercise 1. In the LIBOR Market Model (LMM), each forward rate \(L_k(t)\) follows \(dL_k = \mu_k\,dt + \sigma_k L_k\,dW_k\) under the risk-neutral measure. Under the \(T_{k+1}\)-forward measure, what is the drift of \(L_k\)?
Solution to Exercise 1
Under the \(T_{k+1}\)-forward measure \(\mathbb{Q}^{T_{k+1}}\), the forward rate \(L_k(t)\) is a martingale, so its drift is zero:
This is the key simplification of the LMM: by choosing the appropriate forward measure for each caplet, the drift disappears and the forward rate follows a geometric Brownian motion. The caplet on \(L_k\) can then be priced using Black's formula directly.
Exercise 2. Using Black's formula under the LMM, price a caplet with \(L_k(0) = 5\%\), strike \(K = 4.5\%\), volatility \(\sigma_k = 20\%\), expiry \(T_k = 2\) years, \(\tau = 0.5\) years, notional \(N = \$1{,}000{,}000\), and \(P(0, T_{k+1}) = 0.95\).
Solution to Exercise 2
Compute \(d_1\) and \(d_2\):
The caplet price is
Exercise 3. Explain the difference between caplet volatilities (spot volatilities) and cap volatilities (flat volatilities) in the LMM framework.
Solution to Exercise 3
Caplet volatilities \(\sigma_k\) are the individual volatility parameters for each forward rate \(L_k\). Each caplet can have a different volatility reflecting the term structure of volatility. Cap volatilities are single "flat" volatilities \(\bar{\sigma}\) that, when applied to all caplets in a cap, reproduce the market cap price:
The flat cap volatility is a weighted average of the individual caplet volatilities, with weights depending on the caplet prices. Converting between the two is called "cap stripping."
Exercise 4. If caplet volatilities for years 1 through 5 are \(\{18\%, 19\%, 20\%, 21\%, 22\%\}\), what qualitative pattern does this represent, and what are its implications for cap pricing?
Solution to Exercise 4
This is an upward-sloping volatility term structure: longer-dated caplets have higher volatilities. This pattern implies that the market expects greater uncertainty about forward rates further in the future. For cap pricing:
- Short-dated caps are priced with lower volatilities and are therefore cheaper per unit of risk.
- Long-dated caps have progressively higher volatilities, making them relatively more expensive.
- The flat cap volatility for a 5-year cap will be a weighted average, somewhere between \(18\%\) and \(22\%\), with longer-dated caplets receiving more weight due to their higher notional contribution.