Reflection Principle¶
Introduction¶
The reflection principle is a pathwise symmetry argument used to compute probabilities involving the running maximum of Brownian motion. From it we extract:
- the distribution of the running maximum \(M_t\),
- the joint distribution of \((M_t, W_t)\),
- and (via \(\{\tau_a \le t\} = \{M_t \ge a\}\)) the gateway to first-passage results developed in § First Passage Times.
Recall (see § Brownian Motion): \(W_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0,t)\) with continuous paths.
Maximum of Brownian Motion¶
Statement and Geometric Idea¶
Let \(W_t\) be standard Brownian motion and \(a > 0\). Define the maximum up to time \(t\):
Theorem 1.6.1 (Reflection Principle for Maximum)
For any \(t > 0\) and \(a > 0\):
Geometric Idea:
The proof constructs a pathwise bijection between two sets of paths:
- Set A: Paths that hit level \(a\) before time \(t\) and end below \(a\)
- Set B: Paths that hit level \(a\) before time \(t\) and end above \(a\)
The bijection works by reflecting the portion of the path after the first hitting time \(\tau_a\) across the level \(a\).
Detailed Proof¶
Proof:
Define the first hitting time of level \(a\):
We partition the event \(\{M_t \ge a\}\) based on where the path ends:
Step 1: Event where path ends above \(a\).
Since \(W_0 = 0 < a\) and paths are continuous, any path with \(W_t \geq a\) must have crossed \(a\) at some earlier time, so \(\{W_t \geq a\} \subseteq \{M_t \geq a\}\):
Step 2: Event where path ends below \(a\).
For paths that hit \(a\) at time \(\tau_a < t\) but end at \(W_t < a\), we construct the reflected path:
Key observation: By the strong Markov property, after hitting \(a\), the process \(W_{\tau_a + s} - a\) is a Brownian motion independent of \(\mathcal{F}_{\tau_a}\). The reflection \(2a - W_s\) has the same distribution as \(W_s\) for \(s > \tau_a\).
Therefore, the reflected endpoint is:
Bijection: The map \(W \mapsto \tilde{W}\) establishes a bijection:
Each path ending at \(W_t = x < a\) corresponds to a reflected path ending at \(\tilde{W}_t = 2a - x > a\).
Step 3: Combine.
(The second equality uses the fact that if the reflected path ends above \(a\), the original path must have hit \(a\).)
Therefore:
Explicit Formula for the Maximum¶
Since \(W_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0, t)\):
where \(\Phi\) is the standard normal CDF.
Joint Distribution of Maximum and Endpoint¶
Statement¶
Theorem 1.6.2 (Reflection Principle for Joint Events)
For \(a > 0\) and \(b < a\):
Proof:
The same reflection argument applies. For paths that hit level \(a\) at time \(\tau_a\) and end at \(W_t \le b < a\), reflect the portion after \(\tau_a\):
The bijection maps:
Therefore:
Explicit Formula for the Joint Tail¶
Since \(W_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0, t)\):
First passage times: handled separately
Recall (see § First Passage Times): the first hitting time \(\tau_a := \inf\{t \ge 0 : W_t = a\}\) satisfies \(\{\tau_a \le t\} = \{M_t \ge a\}\), so its distribution, density, moments, and Laplace transform follow from the maximum identity above. The full development is in that section; this page handles only the geometric/symmetry side.
Joint Density of Maximum and Endpoint¶
We now derive the complete joint density \(f_{M_t, W_t}(m, w)\).
Main Result¶
Theorem 1.6.8 (Joint PDF of Maximum and Endpoint)
For \(m > 0\) and \(w \le m\):
Derivation¶
Step 1: CDF via reflection.
From Theorem 1.6.2, for \(w < m\):
Therefore:
Step 2: Differentiate to get the joint PDF.
First, differentiate with respect to \(w\):
where \(\phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-x^2/2}\).
Now differentiate with respect to \(m\):
Conditional Distribution¶
Corollary 1.6.9 (Conditional PDF of Maximum Given Endpoint)
Given \(W_t = w\), the conditional density of \(M_t\) is:
for \(m \ge w\).
Proof:
Simplify the exponentials:
Therefore:
Summary¶
- Maximum distribution: \(\mathbb{P}(M_t \ge a) = 2\mathbb{P}(W_t \ge a) = 2\Phi(-a/\sqrt{t})\)
- Joint distribution: \(\mathbb{P}(M_t \ge a, W_t \le b) = \mathbb{P}(W_t \ge 2a - b)\) for \(b < a\)
- Joint density: \(f_{M_t, W_t}(m, w) = \frac{2(2m-w)}{t\sqrt{2\pi t}} e^{-(2m-w)^2/(2t)}\) for \(m > 0\), \(w \le m\)
- First passage: developed in § First Passage Times via \(\{\tau_a \le t\} = \{M_t \ge a\}\).
Exercises¶
Reflection Principle¶
Let \(M_t := \sup_{0 \le s \le t} W_s\).
- Use the reflection principle to compute \(\mathbb{P}(M_t \ge a)\) for \(a > 0\).
Solution to Exercise 1
By the reflection principle (Theorem 1.6.1), for \(a > 0\):
Proof: Partition \(\{M_t \ge a\}\) into paths ending above and below \(a\):
The first term equals \(\mathbb{P}(W_t \ge a)\) since continuous paths starting at \(0\) must cross \(a\) to end above \(a\). For the second term, the reflection argument at \(\tau_a\) maps \(\{M_t \ge a, W_t < a\}\) bijectively onto \(\{M_t \ge a, W_t > a\} = \{W_t > a\}\), preserving probability by the strong Markov property. Therefore:
Since \(\mathbb{P}(W_t = a) = 0\) for continuous distributions.
- Deduce the distribution of \(M_t\) (find the CDF and PDF).
Solution to Exercise 2
CDF: From Exercise 1, for \(a > 0\):
For \(a \le 0\): \(\mathbb{P}(M_t \le a) = 0\) since \(M_t \ge W_0 = 0\).
PDF: Differentiate the CDF with respect to \(a\) (for \(a > 0\)):
for \(a > 0\), and \(f_{M_t}(a) = 0\) for \(a < 0\). This is twice the density of \(|W_t|\), which makes sense since \(M_t \overset{d}{=} |W_t|\) (a consequence of the reflection principle).
- Compute \(\mathbb{P}(|W_t| \ge a)\) using symmetry.
Solution to Exercise 3
By symmetry of Brownian motion, \(W_t \overset{d}{=} -W_t\), so \(\mathbb{P}(W_t \ge a) = \mathbb{P}(W_t \le -a) = \mathbb{P}(-W_t \ge a)\).
for \(a > 0\). Note this equals \(\mathbb{P}(M_t \ge a)\) from Exercise 1, confirming \(M_t \overset{d}{=} |W_t|\).
- Show that the joint density integrates to 1: \(\int_0^\infty \int_{-\infty}^m f_{M_t, W_t}(m, w) \, dw \, dm = 1\).
Solution to Exercise 4
We need to show \(\int_0^\infty \int_{-\infty}^m f_{M_t, W_t}(m, w)\,dw\,dm = 1\) where:
for \(m > 0\) and \(w \le m\).
Inner integral (over \(w\) for fixed \(m > 0\)): Substitute \(u = (2m - w)/\sqrt{t}\), so \(w = 2m - u\sqrt{t}\) and \(dw = -\sqrt{t}\,du\). When \(w = -\infty\), \(u = +\infty\); when \(w = m\), \(u = m/\sqrt{t}\):
Outer integral (over \(m\)):
More directly: \(\int_0^\infty e^{-m^2/(2t)}\,dm = \sqrt{t}\int_0^\infty e^{-v^2/2}\,dv = \sqrt{t}\sqrt{\pi/2}\). So \(\frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\sqrt{t}\sqrt{\pi/2} = \frac{2\sqrt{t}\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{2}\sqrt{2\pi}} = 1\).
Hitting Times (cross-references)¶
Recall (see § First Passage Times): for \(a > 0\), \(\tau_a := \inf\{t \ge 0 : W_t = a\}\) satisfies \(\mathbb{P}(\tau_a < \infty) = 1\), \(\mathbb{E}[\tau_a] = \infty\), and has Lévy density \(f_{\tau_a}(t) = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2\pi t^3}}e^{-a^2/(2t)}\). Detailed exercises (recurrence, moments, normalization, Laplace transform) live in that section.
- Show that \(\mathbb{P}(\tau_a = \tau_b) = 0\) for \(a \neq b\), \(a, b > 0\). (Hint: Suppose \(\tau_a = \tau_b = \tau\). Then \(W_\tau = a\) and \(W_\tau = b\) simultaneously. Why is this impossible when \(a \neq b\)?)
Solution to Exercise 5
Suppose \(\tau_a = \tau_b = \tau\) for some realization. At time \(\tau\), continuity of Brownian paths requires \(W_\tau = a\) (since \(\tau = \tau_a\)) and \(W_\tau = b\) (since \(\tau = \tau_b\)). But \(a \neq b\), so \(W_\tau\) cannot equal both simultaneously.
More rigorously, without loss of generality assume \(0 < a < b\). Then \(\tau_a \le \tau_b\) a.s. (the path must hit \(a\) before reaching \(b\) since it starts at \(0\) and is continuous). The event \(\{\tau_a = \tau_b\}\) requires \(W_{\tau_a} = b\), but \(W_{\tau_a} = a \neq b\). Therefore \(\{\tau_a = \tau_b\}\) is contained in a null set, and \(\mathbb{P}(\tau_a = \tau_b) = 0\).
- Compute \(\mathbb{E}[M_T | W_T = w]\) using the conditional density \(f_{M_t|W_t}(m|w)\).
Solution to Exercise 6
Using \(f_{M_t|W_t}(m|w) = \frac{2(2m-w)}{t} e^{-2m(m-w)/t}\) for \(m \ge \max(w, 0)\):
For \(w \ge 0\), substitute \(v = m - w/2\) (so \(2m - w = 2v\) and \(m = v + w/2\)), and let \(c = 2/T\):
This integral does not simplify to a closed form in elementary functions for general \(w\). However, for \(w = 0\):
Using \(\int_0^\infty x^2 e^{-\beta x^2}\,dx = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{4\beta^{3/2}}\) with \(\beta = 2/T\):
Applications¶
Recall (see § First Passage Times): Laplace transform \(\mathbb{E}[e^{-\alpha\tau_a}] = e^{-a\sqrt{2\alpha}}\) and the verification \(\int_0^\infty f_{\tau_a}(t)\,dt = 1\) are exercises in that section.
- For a knock-in barrier option that activates when the asset first hits level \(B > S_0\), derive the activation probability by time \(T\) using the reflection principle.
Solution to Exercise 7
A knock-in barrier option activates when the asset first hits level \(B > S_0\). Under the Black-Scholes model \(S_t = S_0 e^{(r - \sigma^2/2)t + \sigma W_t}\), the barrier is hit by time \(T\) if:
However, this simplification is not exact because the drift term \((r - \sigma^2/2)s\) varies with \(s\). For the simplified case (ignoring drift, i.e., using the martingale measure where the log-price drift is \(-\sigma^2/2\)), define:
The activation probability is:
With drift \(\mu = (r - \sigma^2/2)/\sigma\), the Girsanov-adjusted formula gives a more complex expression involving both \(\Phi(-a/\sqrt{T})\) and correction terms from the drift.
- (Drawdown) The drawdown at time \(t\) is \(DD_t = M_t - W_t\). Using the joint density, compute \(\mathbb{P}(DD_T > d)\) for fixed \(d > 0\).
Solution to Exercise 8
The drawdown \(DD_T = M_T - W_T\) where \(M_T = \sup_{0 \le s \le T} W_s\). We want \(\mathbb{P}(DD_T > d) = \mathbb{P}(M_T - W_T > d)\).
Using the joint density \(f_{M_T, W_T}(m, w)\):
Substituting \(f_{M_T, W_T}(m, w) = \frac{2(2m-w)}{T\sqrt{2\pi T}} e^{-(2m-w)^2/(2T)}\) and setting \(v = 2m - w\) (so \(w = 2m - v\) and the condition \(w \le m - d\) becomes \(v \ge m + d\)):
The inner integral evaluates as:
Therefore:
Substitute \(u = (m + d)/\sqrt{T}\):
This shows that the drawdown \(DD_T\) has the same distribution as \(|W_T|\), i.e., \(DD_T \overset{d}{=} M_T \overset{d}{=} |W_T|\).
References¶
- Karatzas, I., & Shreve, S. E. (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed. Springer. (Chapter 3, Section 6)
- Revuz, D., & Yor, M. (1999). Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd ed. Springer. (Chapter VI)
- Mörters, P., & Peres, Y. (2010). Brownian Motion. Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 3)
- Shreve, S. E. (2004). Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models. Springer. (Chapter 7 - Barrier Options)